Did BI resign???

**Phone Doc** · July 29th, 2011, 10:21 AM

Ok Dude, once again I appreciate the concerns and the "coaching" you've offered over a flippant remark. I would like to share that the density of my skull has absolutely no bearing on your "constructive" offerings and my ability to understand. I would think that someone who has over 9000 postings would be astute enough to determine sarcasm in a posting. The point of the matter is that the comment about B.I. coaching at St. Paul was ever bit as absurd as some of the other postings and theories expressed by other "experts" in this thread and yet I haven't noticed any "attacks" on those opinions or remarks. I didn't read any guidelines in the rules for this site that indicated I needed to take my time before being sarcastic or anything else and I certainly didn't see you listed as "thread monitor". While I'm not a whinning jackoff, you apparently hit the nail on the head by categorizing yourself as an asshole. However the sarcastic adjetive is not applicable since you are not apparently familiar with the term sarcasm. Your turn.............................

**Phone Doc** · July 29th, 2011, 11:11 AM

my last response apparently was deleted due to its content so I'll just say, any future posting you see from me, consider the source and be aware of the fact that hidden humor or sarcasm could be lurking within. Have a nice day

**VHSLhelper** · July 29th, 2011, 02:31 PM

"hidden" doesn't work well on msg. boards. That's why ppl. use smileys, !!! and ;-).

**Ironlung** · July 29th, 2011, 04:57 PM

Originally Posted by Phone Doc

Ok Dude, once again I appreciate the concerns and the "coaching" you've offered over a flippant remark. I would like to share that the density of my skull has absolutely no bearing on your "constructive" offerings and my ability to understand. I would think that someone who has over 9000 postings would be astute enough to determine sarcasm in a posting. The point of the matter is that the comment about B.I. coaching at St. Paul was ever bit as absurd as some of the other postings and theories expressed by other "experts" in this thread and yet I haven't noticed any "attacks" on those opinions or remarks. I didn't read any guidelines in the rules for this site that indicated I needed to take my time before being sarcastic or anything else and I certainly didn't see you listed as "thread monitor". While I'm not a whinning jackoff, you apparently hit the nail on the head by categorizing yourself as an asshole. However the sarcastic adjetive is not applicable since you are not apparently familiar with the term sarcasm. Your turn.............................

Still does not get it.

**SWVA-Football** · July 29th, 2011, 05:56 PM

Perhaps it's a blessing that this user has just 7 posts in a span of 10 years.

**Skeletor** · July 31st, 2011, 07:32 AM

Originally Posted by Phone Doc

...I was not aware that it was necessary to have a specific number of posts prior to sarcastic or humorous posts.

50 Posts, if Im not mistaken is the Required number. FYI

I hate to see this I've met BI a few times here, and there. Seemed like a good guy, and obviously did Tons for the Program at JJ Kelly. As someone mentioned before you know more went down than what came out in the paper.

Im sure he'll land on his feet somewhere.